Reconciling "priors" & "priors" without prejudice?
نویسندگان
چکیده
There are two major routes to address linear inverse problems. Whereas regularization-based approaches build estimators as solutions of penalized regression optimization problems, Bayesian estimators rely on the posterior distribution of the unknown, given some assumed family of priors. While these may seem radically different approaches, recent results have shown that, in the context of additive white Gaussian denoising, the Bayesian conditional mean estimator is always the solution of a penalized regression problem. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we extend the additive white Gaussian denoising results to general linear inverse problems with colored Gaussian noise. Second, we characterize conditions under which the penalty function associated to the conditional mean estimator can satisfy certain popular properties such as convexity, separability, and smoothness. This sheds light on some tradeoff between computational efficiency and estimation accuracy in sparse regularization, and draws some connections between Bayesian estimation and proximal optimization.
منابع مشابه
Of priors and prejudice
The methods of Maximum Entropy have been deployed for some years to address the problem of species abundance distributions. It is important to identify correctly weighting factors, or priors, to be applied before maximising the entropy function subject to constraints. The form of such priors depends not only on the exact problem but can also depend on the way it is set up; priors are determined...
متن کاملSUSY Without Prejudice at Linear Colliders
We explore the physics of the general CP-conserving MSSM with Minimal Flavor Violation, the pMSSM. The 19 soft SUSY breaking parameters are chosen so to satisfy all existing experimental and theoretical constraints assuming that the WIMP is the lightest neutralino. We scan this parameter space twice using both flat and log priors and compare the results which yield similar conclusions. Constrai...
متن کاملBayesian Sample size Determination for Longitudinal Studies with Continuous Response using Marginal Models
Introduction Longitudinal study designs are common in a lot of scientific researches, especially in medical, social and economic sciences. The reason is that longitudinal studies allow researchers to measure changes of each individual over time and often have higher statistical power than cross-sectional studies. Choosing an appropriate sample size is a crucial step in a successful study. A st...
متن کاملThe neglected tool in the Bayesian ecologist's shed: a case study testing informative priors' effect on model accuracy
Despite benefits for precision, ecologists rarely use informative priors. One reason that ecologists may prefer vague priors is the perception that informative priors reduce accuracy. To date, no ecological study has empirically evaluated data-derived informative priors' effects on precision and accuracy. To determine the impacts of priors, we evaluated mortality models for tree species using d...
متن کاملJe reys Priors versus Experienced Physicist Priors Arguments against Objective Bayesian Theory
I review the problem of the choice of the priors from the point of view of a physicist interested in measuring a physical quantity and I try to show that the reference priors often recommended for the purpose Je reys priors do not t to the problem Although it may seem sur prising it is easier for an experienced physicist to accept subjective priors or even purely subjective elicitation of proba...
متن کامل